Skip to content
All posts
Watch & Learn/6:11

Real Estate Broker Gives His Raw Opinion on Agentattraction.io's System

Asking a current client what they actually think of the system, with no script and no filter, is the only honest review. Here's a raw breakdown from a working broker.

What they liked

The funnel did the heavy lifting. The calendar filled within the first week. The applications came in pre-qualified, with deals closed and income goals already on the form. The first close happened inside 30 days.

What surprised them most was the quality. Producing agents who were already considering a switch — not random Indeed applicants.

What they pushed back on

Ad spend variance month-to-month. They wanted more predictability on cost-per-application. We gave them a baseline range — $150–$175 cost-per-application is typical — but the variance is real, and they wanted us to be more explicit about that up front.

The bottom line they shared

"Recruited three producing agents in the first 60 days. The system paid for itself. I'd do it again." That's the unscripted version. We don't pay for testimonials and we don't edit them down to soundbites.

Key Takeaways

  • The funnel filled the calendar inside week one.
  • Applications came in pre-qualified with deals/income data.
  • Three producing agents in the first 60 days paid for the system.
  • Ad spend variance is real — $150–$175 cost-per-application is the baseline.
  • The honest review is the only review worth listening to.

Watch on YouTube

More Posts

Keep going.